ad: IACantenna-1
ad: L-HROutlet
ad: l-rl
ad: l-assoc
ad: Subscribe

Login is required for additional detail.

Platinum Subscriber Lookups: 40708

I became interested in radio when I was about 10 years old while visiting a friend of my parents who amazed me by showing me a crystal radio that he had built in a pill bottle.

I lost interest in radio through my teenage years when my thoughts turned to cars and girls. Regardless of those hormonal distractions, I still managed to graduate from Carnegie-Mellon University with a Bachelors Degree in Mechanical Engineering and got a job with GM while I drove and drag-raced a 1967 435 hp Corvette. I still have that Corvette and a couple years ago it was given a from-the-ground-up restoration. My wife and I occasionally take it out for evening drives during the summer months.

Later when the CB craze hit I vaguely remembered that there was such a thing as Ham Radio. In short order, I got my license, bought my first radio - a Collins S-Line from AES in Cleveland - and began learning how to make antennas since it was obvious that they were the most important part of the station.

I also rapidly learned that having a big signal was pointless unless you could hear the other station.

Today I have an excellent station with great transmit antennas but I also have the best receiving antennas that I can find.

This is not based on my knowledge of electronics, rather it is based on noticing that three stations that place at top of the heap in many DX Contests all use DX Engineering Receiving Systems.

So, my receiving setup consists of (4) 700 foot Beverage antennas fed with DX Engineering Reversible Beverage Antenna Systems which I have used to good advantage.

But the same top stations also use the DX Engineering DXE-RFS-2P Receive Four Square Array Switch which allows a very effective receiving array that doesn't take up much room but basically is every bit as good as my Beverages. So, I also installed a DX Engineering Receive Four Square Array for 80M and one for 160M.

As shown they are active receiving antennas with short stainless whips mounted on top. Four of them are arranged in a square which is a quarter-wave on a side for each band. I could have chosen to use an in-between spacing so that one system would work on the 2 bands but I had the room for the 160M system and I just mounted the 80M system inside the 160M one. Thankfully, no radials are required with the active antennas. The ground rods are sufficient.

They exhibit excellent front-to-back performance and I can hear very well. How well? Well, unless local QRN is a factor, it is rare that I can't hear a station that gets reported on the cluster as being heard by any other US station. Also, I have monitored W8JI when he is on the air making contacts and I can hear 95+% of what he can hear at about the same signal quality level. And since I hate getting up early, I don't make it much of a priority to work low band DX but I have 238 countries worked on 160M, 310 countries worked on 80M and 334 countries worked on 40M.

I have all current DXCC Countries (340) worked and confirmed.

In addition, my last country for Top of the Honor Roll was Glorioso (#338) which I worked on quite a few bands as shown below. I was #1 in my zone and even managed to place pretty well nationally. No, I didn't work them on 160M but I know of only 3 stations on the East Coast who did work them on 160 - W3LPL, W3UR and W4DR and I am decidedly not near the East Coast and all that salt water.

So, IMHO, antennas are the most important part of your station and receiving antennas are the most important if you want to hear the weak ones!

73, Paul - NO8D

7174543 Last modified: 2016-03-18 14:51:20, 4322 bytes

Login Required

Login is required for additional detail.

Apply for a new Vanity callsign...

You must be logged in to file a report on this page

Please login now...

ad: giga-db
Copyright © 2018 by QRZ.COM
Fri Feb 23 00:44:57 2018 UTC
CPU: 0.047 sec 60497 bytes mp